Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 Pa. Commw. 95 - Richards v. ALSTON

123 Pa. Commw. 95 - Richards v. ALSTON’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1991
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh · Zakian v. LILJESTRAND · 228 Pa. Super. 201 - O'BARTO v. Glossers Stores, Inc. · Wnek v. Boyle · Sheriff v. Eisele

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under Pa.R.C.P. 2255(d), a plaintiff, even though he or she may have asserted no claim against an additional defendant in a pleading against it, may recover directly from an additional defendant as from an original defendant when the facts established at trial show that the additional defendant is liable to him or her either solely or jointly or severally with the original defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.