¶1Affirmed. See McDuffie v. State, 970 So.2d 312, 323 n. 2 (Fla.2007); Cooper v. State, 45 So.3d 490, 494 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (affirming trial court’s exclusion of reverse Williams rule evidence where the “similar fact evidence” “was overly general and did not meet the ‘close similarity of facts, a unique or fingerprint type of information’ test for relevancy”); Neals v. State, 972 So.2d 1047, 1048 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
123 So. 3d 654
Collins v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 9, 2013
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2013-10-09
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2014
4 state decisions
Relies on 970 So. 2d 312 - McDuffie v. State · 45 So. 3d 490 - Cooper v. State · 972 So. 2d 1047 - Neals v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2013-10-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →