Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 SO3D 940 - Foster v. Durr

Foster v. Durr’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stanley v. State · Swilley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “entitled to 233 days of credit for jail time served while awaiting trial. He was convicted ... of two charges which had individual and joint presentence jail-time attributable to them. Foster-just like Al-Khidhr-argued that his jail-time credit should have been applied to each of his sentences individually because his sentences were consecutive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “cannot receive credit twice for the same presentence jail-time served for multiple offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.