Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 SW3D 227 - Engeman v. Engeman

Engeman v. Engeman’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Tbg v. Cag · Hoffmann v. Hoffmann · Guier v. Guier · Silcox v. Silcox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial court has discretion in determining whether income should be imputed to a party for purposes of making child support calculations. See Lavalle v. Lavalle, 11 S.W.3d 640, 650 (Mo.App.1999). Imputation decisions must be made on a case-by-case basis and only when appropriate circumstances are present. See id. It is not unusual for a court to decline to impute income to a custodial parent. See id. (citing numerous cases to that effect).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.