Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 SW3D 431 - Rapp v. Mandell & Wright, P.C.

Rapp v. Mandell & Wright, P.C.’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 11th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Carle v. Carle · Crown Life Insurance Company v. Casteel · Miga v. Jensen · Pattee v. Pattee · Bloom v. Bloom

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An unconditional satisfaction and release of judgment operates as a total relinquishment of all rights of the judgment creditor in the judgment; it is a complete discharge of the debt created by the judgment and a complete surrender of the judgment creditor’s rights in the judgment, including the right to challenge the judgment on appeal and seek a judgment in excess of the amounts awarded in the trial court’s judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.