State v. Blankenship’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Vanderbilt v. State · Lyon v. State · Olivo v. State · State v. Riewe · State v. Roberts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The State argues that the assertion in the [amended] notice of appeal was sufficient to infer personal authorization by the county attorney for the appeal. We do not agree that it was an adequate substitution for the county attorney’s personal, express, and specific making of an appeal as required by article 44.01. Article 45.201 relates to the consent of the county attorney for a city attorney or assistants to “handle” or prosecute an appeal. It does not trump the requirements of article 44.01 as to the notice of appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Blankenship
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.