Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 U.S. 369 - Mustin v. Cadwalader

Mustin v. Cadwalader’s Empirical Analysis

123 U.S. 369 · 1887

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
October 1925
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1925

4 federal appellate ·

7018871890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““form No. 102. “ Importer’s Notice to Collector Claiming Reappraisement. “-,--,18 — . “ Sir : As I consider the appraisement made by the United States appraisers too high on — r— , imported by--, in the--, from--, I have to request that the same may be reappraised pursuant to law with as little delay as your convenience will permit. “--, collector cf the customs.” Articles 464 and 465 provide for a special report of the local appraisers to be made after such notice claiming a reappraisement is given. “ Merchant Appraisers. “ Art. 466.' On the receipt of this report the collector will select one discreet and experienced merchant, a citizen of the United States, familiar with the character and value of the goods in question, to be associated with an appraiser at large, if the attendance of such officer be practicable, to examine and appraise the same according to law. R. S. 2930. The selection of merchant appraisers should not be confined exclusively to those connected with foreign imports, but when the requisite knowledge exists should be extended so as to embrace domestic manufacturers and producers and other citizens acting as merchants, although not dealing in foreign merchandise. S. 6111. The merchant thus selected will be notified by the collector of his appointment and of the time and place of the reexamination. The appraiser at large will be notified of the appeal, of the time fixed for reappraisement, and of the name of the merchant appraiser. The importer will he noti”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.