Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 Wash. 403 - State v. Eckert

State v. Eckert’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
6
states following
April 1986
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 1986

15 state decisions

401923193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lowe v. State · State v. Bringgold · Stokes v. State · State v. Koerner · Holsclaw v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As a general rule a judgment by confession is not reversible either by appeal or writ of error and in a criminal case a party cannot have a judgment properly entered on a plea of guilty reversed by appeal or writ of error, since such judgment is in effect a judgment by -confession.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.