123 Wash. 2d 885 - State v. Garza’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
July 2007
most recently cited
36 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 121 Wash. 2d 707 - State v. Mail · 115 Wash. 2d 275 - State v. Handley · 117 Wash. 2d 156 - State v. Allert · 68 Wash. App. 906 - State v. Nguyen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining any sentence, the trial court may rely on no more information than is admitted by the plea agreement, or admitted, acknowledged, or proved in a trial or at the time of sentencing. Acknowledgement includes not objecting to information stated in the presentence reports. Where the defendant disputes material facts, the court must either not consider the fact or grant an evidentiary hearing on the point.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“). Appellate review of an exceptional sentence is governed by RCW 9.94A.210(4). This provision requires review of three specific issues: 1. Are the reasons given supported by evidence in the record? As to this, the standard of review is”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“in order to dispute any of the information presented for consideration at a sentencing hearing, a defendant must make a timely and specific challenge.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.