123 Wis. 2d 375 - State v. Mann’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

cited by 29 later decisions

states following

June 2019

most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 201 Wis. 2d 820 - State v. Gilmore (1996), 144 Wis. 2d 596 - State v. Mitchell (1988)

29 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Jaben v. United States · 105 Ill. 2d 22 - People v. Stewart · 121 Wis. 2d 389 - State v. Dunn · 40 Wis. 2d 223 - State Ex Rel. Evanow v. Seraphim

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“'the defendant makes a substantial preliminary showing that a false statement knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, was included by the affiant in the warrant affidavit, and if the allegedly false statement is necessary to the finding of probable cause[.]'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Jones · 385 Wis. 2d 847 - State v. Sabo
“Because we can find no real difference in effect between a false statement made knowingly and intentionally or with reckless disregard for the truth and a critical omission from the complaint, we hold the principles of Franks permit an attack on criminal complaints where there has been an omission of critical material where inclusion is necessary for an impartial judge to fairly determine probable cause.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 213 Wis. 2d 308 - State v. Manuel · 370 Wis. 2d 198 - State v. Kilgore
“[A]n omitted fact [is] the equivalent of 'a deliberate falsehood or a reckless disregard for the truth' " if it is "an undisputed fact that is critical to an impartial judge's fair determination of probable cause.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 387 Wis. 2d 685 - State v. Brown · 388 Wis. 2d 256 - State v. Hershey

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.