123 Wis. 2d 397 - State v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2010
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 106 Wis. 2d 368 - State v. Alles · 121 Wis. 2d 389 - State v. Dunn · 111 Wis. 2d 507 - Auric v. Continental Casualty Co. · 83 Wis. 2d 368 - Whitaker v. State · 101 Wis. 2d 517 - State v. Hooper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whoever intentionally solicits. . .any person to practice prostitution.. .is guilty of a Class D felony.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“to curtail the recruitment of males and females into the practice of providing sex”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Any person who intentionally does any of the following is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor: (1) Has or offers to have or requests to have nonmarital sexual intercourse for anything of value. (2) Commits or offers to commit or requests to commit an act of sexual gratification, in public or in private, involving the sex organ of one person and the mouth or anus of another for anything of value. (3) Is an inmate in a place of prostitution. (4) Masturbates a person or offers to masturbate a person or requests to be masturbated by a person for anything of value. (5) Commits or offers to commit or requests to commit an act of sexual contact for anything of value.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.