Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 Wis. 2d 428 - State v. Grawien

123 Wis. 2d 428 - State v. Grawien’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
8
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

91 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Commonwealth v. Edmunds (1991), State v. Marsala (1990)

91 state decisions

46019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · United States v. Leon · Mapp v. Ohio · O’Callahan v. Parker, Warden · American Sterilizer Co. v. Sybron Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A search made pursuant to warrant issued by a justice of the peace to whom the legislature had not granted the power to issue such a warrant is an unreasonable search and in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 383 Wis. 2d 306 - State v. Christopher John Kerr · State v. Hess
  2. “The Wisconsin Supreme Court, unlike the court of appeals, has been designated by the constitution and the legislature as a law-declaring court. While the court of appeals also serves a law-declaring function, such pronouncements should not occur in cases of great moment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Friends of Frame Park, U.A. v. City of Waukesha · Derrick A. Sanders v. State of Wisconsin Claims Board
  3. “has been designated by the constitution and the legislature as a law- declaring court. . . . While the court of appeals also serves a law-declaring function, such pronouncements should not occur in cases of great moment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Alan S. Johnson

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.