123 Wis. 2d 458 - State v. Renard’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 168 W. Va. 111 - Bowman v. Barnes (1981), 129 Wis. 2d 277 - State v. McCrossen (1986)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on California v. Trombetta · 119 Wis. 2d 483 - State v. Walstad · 119 Wis. 2d 461 - State v. Disch · 107 Wis. 2d 118 - City of Lodi v. Hine · State v. Stitzel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Suppression of the blood test is an appropriate sanction for failure to comply with sec. 343.305(5). The duty to perform the requested additional test became mandatory after Renard submitted to a blood test. The circuit court must strictly enforce the statutory right to an additional test. See Walstad, 119 Wis. 2d at 527, 351 N.W. 2d at 491. 4 Denial of an additional chemical test effectively prevented discovery of material evidence relating to the prior test. Id. at 537, 351 N.W. 2d at 490-91. When an accused is denied a statutory right to discover evidence relating to a chemical test, the proper sanction is suppression of the test results. See City of Lodi v. Hine, 107 Wis. 2d 118, 122 , 318 N.W. 2d 383, 384 (1982)."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Renard and his wife claim he continued to request the breathalyzer test after he consented to the blood test [and] [t]he officer denied this contention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“diligent effort... to comply with the demand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.