124 Ala. 90
Decided November 15, 1899
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1899-11-15
Tried before Hon. E. B. Wilkerson. The defendant was tried by a jury and convicted. But no judgment Avas rendered in the case except a judgment of confession for the. fine and costs. cited Ayers v. State, 71 Ala. 11; Nichols v. State, 100 Ala. 23.
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1968
2 state decisions
Relies on Nichols v. State · Ayers v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1899-11-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1— In this record there is no judgment shown which will support an appeal.' No judgment of conviction was entered upon the verdict and the judgment by confession for the fine and costs cannot be appealed from. — Ayers v. State, 71 Ala. 11; Nichols v. State, 100 Ala. 23.
¶2The appeal must be dismissed.