Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 Ariz. 100 - Chapman v. Field

Chapman v. Field’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
9
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

4 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably Standage v. Standage (1985), Wilmington Trust Co. v. Conner (1980)

4 district · 24 state decisions

25019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bearden · Bank of Gering v. Glover · 57 Wis. 2d 106 - Vic Hansen & Sons, Inc. v. Crowley · Barker v. Horn · 16 Ariz. App. 206 - Dietel v. Day

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The courts are not in agreement as to whether failure under the Uniform Commercial Code to give adequate notice bars the right to a deficiency judgment.... A third line of cases holds that lack of notice does not bar a deficiency, but that the debtor is entitled to a setoff for any loss which the debtor can show he suffered by lack of notice. [citations omitted] We agree with the latter holding, [citation omitted] and believe the same rule should apply where the secured party retains the chattel without sale. " [Emphasis supplied] 124 Ariz. at 104 , 602 P.2d 481 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a setoff of the damage to the debtor for failure to make a commercially reasonable sale. Chapman v. Field, 124 Ariz. 100, 105 , 602 P.2d 481, 486 (1979).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.