Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 ARK 390 - Davies v. Johnson

Davies v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Warren v. Warren (1981), 23 Ark. App. 203 - Lofton v. Lofton (1988)

21 state decisions

7019161920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Branch v. Polk · Alles v. Lyon · Roulston v. Hall · In re the Appeal of Lewis · Robinson v. Eagle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Neither tenant by entirety can convey his or her interest so as to affect the right of survivorship ■ in the other. The alienation by the husband of a moiety will not defeat the wife’s title to that moiety if she survive him; but, if he survive, the conveyance becomes as effective to pass the whole estate as it would had he been sole seized at the time of the conveyance. The. husband may do what he pleases with the rents and profits during coverture, but he cannot dispose of any part of the inheritance, without his wife’s consent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Where land is conveyed to husband and wife, they do not take by moities, but both are seized of the entirety — the whole in contradistinction to a moiety or part only. . . . Neither tenant by entirety can convey his or her interest so as to affect the right of survivorship in the other. [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.