124 Cal. App. 46 - Stone v. Heyman Bros.’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1960
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lewis v. Terry · Smith v. Tucker · Palmore v. Morris, Tasker & Co. · 101 Cal. App. 769 - Denman v. City of Pasadena
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The rule applicable to the vendor of realty is stated in Upp v. Darner, 150 Iowa 403 [Ann.Cas. 1912D 574, 32 L.R.A.N.S. 743 , 130 N.W. 409, 410 ], as follows: ‘After the owner of such premises has disposed of them he is no longer liable for what may happen thereon for the reason that he is in no position to control the use thereof. ’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Copfer v. Golden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.