People v. Corenevsky’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently June 1987 · most notably 59 Cal. 2d 713 - People v. Haven (1963), Jones v. State (1985)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Newland · 77 Cal. App. 2d 678 - People v. Cannon · 107 Cal. App. 211 - People v. Robinson · 8 Cal. App. 2d 404 - People v. Von Badenthal · People v. Tomlinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The crime of grand theft is complete when a man takes property not his own with the intent to take it, and a defendant may be convicted of grand theft upon proof of facts establishing (a) embezzlement, (b) larceny or (c) obtaining property under false pretenses. . . . “ It is likewise established that where criminal acts may constitute one of two or three forms of theft, depending upon how the jury views the evidence, and the facts so warrant, the verdict of conviction can be sustained on either theory. (People v. Von Badenthal, 8 Cal.App.2d 404, 408 [ 48 P.2d 82 ] People v. Chamberlain, 96 Cal.App.2d 178 , 182 et seq. [ 214 P.2d 600 ].)””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“. . In charging theft it shall be sufficient to allege that the defendant unlawfully took the labor or property of another. ’ ’”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The crime of grand theft is complete when a man takes property not his own with the intent to take it and a defendant may be convicted of grand theft upon proof of facts establishing (a) embezzlement, (b) larceny or (c) obtaining property by false pretenses. * * * "It is likewise established that where criminal acts may constitute one of two or three forms of theft, depending upon how the jury views the evidence, and the facts so warrant, the verdict of conviction can be sustained on either theory.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.