Salinero v. Pon’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently March 2008 · most notably Zapata v. Burns (1988), 34 Cal. 4th 915 - Elsner v. Uveges (2004)
2 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 8 Cal. 3d 855 - Brown v. Merlo · 5 Cal. 3d 730 - County of Alameda v. Carleson · 16 Cal. 3d 392 - Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior Court · Van Arsdale v. Hollinger · Elmore v. American Motors Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The language of [former] section 6304.5 is abundantly clear; the provisions of division 5 of the Labor Codewhich include the statute appellant sought to have admitted into evidenceare not admissible in any third party actions by an employee”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`suffer the inequity of being bound by the decision without any right of review.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Lauren P.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.