124 Cal. App. 4th 286 - Heaps v. Heaps’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 51 Cal. 3d 1130 - In Re Marriage of Arceneaux · George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co. · 117 Cal. App. 4th 519 - In Re Marriage of Steiner and Hosseini · 190 Cal. App. 2d 400 - Rossi v. Hackett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The main purpose of an objection to a proposed statement of decision is not to reargue the merits, but to bring to the court's attention inconsistencies between the court's ruling and the document that is supposed to embody and explain that ruling”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“since the schedule was a general compilation of documents that could not be examined individually by the court without great loss of time, it was admissible”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.