Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 Colo. 229 - Parrish v. Hainlen

Parrish v. Hainlen’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2019

4 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

601951196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dixon v. Kentucky Utilities Co. · Reino v. Montana Mineral Land Development Co. · Hayko v. Colorado & Utah Coal Co. · Gotch v. K. & B. Packing & Provision Co. · Esquibel v. City & County of Denver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““... ‘permanent protection’, as used in the statute under consideration, and as applied to the facts of this case, means the erection about the mouth of an open shaft on coal lands, of a substantial structure or barricade, reasonably durable and adequately resistant to warn and guard away from danger persons who might innocently and without purpose wander upon the premises.” (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The owner operating or controlling coal lands on which there are surface caves or shafts of sufficient depth to endanger the lives of persons, cattle, horses or other stock, shall fence or fill said caves or shafts in such manner as to afford permanent protection to all persons and stock endangered thereby.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.