Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 F.1d 631 - The Wildcroft

The Wildcroft’s Empirical Analysis

124 F. 631 · 1903

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
April 1906
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The libelant asks me to say that a presumption of negligence arises from the fact that at the end of a voyage merchandise that has been received by a carrier in good condition for safe conveyance is found to be damaged, and that the burden of proof is upon the carrier to explain the cause of the injury, upon penalty of being held liable if he is unable to clear his skirts of fault. No doubt this proposition is sound, and does not need the support of authority; but it does not establish the libelant’s right to a decree in the present case, for the plain reason that the ship accepted the burden of proof, and has satisfactorily shown how the sugar in the bottom of the two holds came to be injured by fresh water.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Wildcroft
  2. “this damage was concededly caused by a peril of the seas.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.