Webber v. Mihills’s Empirical Analysis
124 F. 64 · 1903
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1936
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Lincoln v. Sun Vapor Street-Light Co. · Grape Creek Coal Co. v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. · Van Gunden v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co. · United States v. Goodrich · Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. Colorado Eastern Ry. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Attention has been sharply called to this rule (Rule 11, C. C. A., Eighth Circuit [91 Fed. vi, 32 C. C. A. lxxxviii]) and the announcement has been plainly made that .it would be enforced, although in the earlier cases the errors assigned were carefully examined, that no injustice might result from an unexpected application of the rule [citing cases]. But in the later cases the rule has been steadily and uniformly enforced' [citing cases]. * * * The assignment of errors in this case was not filed until seven days after the allowance of the appeal, and the appeal must be dismissed under rule 11.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reed v. Anderson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.