Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

124 F. 734

Docket No. 1,231.

Meyers v. Josephson

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1903.)

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1903-06-20

<p>1. Bankruptcy — Life Insurance Policy — Abandonment by'Trustee.</p> <p>Where the trustees of a bankrupt failed to have insurance policies on his life appraised, or to provide for the payment of premiums thereon, but abandoned the same to the bankrupt as valueless to the estate, which abandonment was subsequently approved by the court, they are not entitled to recover the proceeds of such policies, on the death of the bankrupt pending the proceedings, from the beneficiaries, the premiums having been kept up by them or by the bankrupt.</p>

2 counsel of record

Relies on In re Josephson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1903-06-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1983

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

20190319101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶11. Bankruptcy — Life Insurance Policy — Abandonment by'Trustee.

¶2Where the trustees of a bankrupt failed to have insurance policies on his life appraised, or to provide for the payment of premiums thereon, but abandoned the same to the bankrupt as valueless to the estate, which abandonment was subsequently approved by the court, they are not entitled to recover the proceeds of such policies, on the death of the bankrupt pending the proceedings, from the beneficiaries, the premiums having been kept up by them or by the bankrupt.

¶3Petition for Revision of Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia.

¶4In Bankruptcy. On petition to superintend and revise, in matter of law, bankruptcy proceedings in the District Court for the Southern District of Georgia.

¶5For opinion below, see 121 Fed. 142.

¶6C. Henry Cohen and Geo. S. Jones, for petitioners.

¶7Jno. P. Ross, for respondents.

¶8Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.

¶9PER CURIAM.

¶10We have given this petition careful and attentive consideration, and therefore now, at this time, considering that the insurance policies on the life of the bankrupt, Josephson, were onerous contracts which, in the interest of the bankruptcy estate, might well have been abandoned by the trustees; that the trustees, by failing to provide for the premiums falling due on the 24th of March, 1901, and otherwise by failing to have said policies appraised and sold with the assets of the estate, and in permitting the policies to be delivered to the bankrupt, substantially abandoned said onerous contracts, which abandonment in fact has since been approved by the bankruptcy court; and that the decree of the District Court is in all respects equitable and just—

¶11It is now ordered and decreed that the petition for superintendence and revision herein filed be denied, and the decree of the District Court in favor of Mrs. Rosa Josephson be approved and affirmed.

/124/f1d/734 · .json · Public domain