Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 F.2d 1005 - Barnett v. Jaspan

Barnett v. Jaspan’s Empirical Analysis

124 F.2d 1005 · 1942

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

67 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2014 · most notably El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Neztsosie (1999), Gino's Pizza of East Hartford, Inc. v. Kaplan (1984)

67 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

36019421950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110

Relies on Great Northern Ry Co v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co · Messenger v. Anderson · In Re Peterson · City of Indianapolis v. Chase Nat Bank of City of New York · Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]everal courts have recognized that, where reversal of a judgment wipes out all basis for recovery against a non-appealing, as well as against an appealing, defendant, the reversal may operate to the benefit of both. [124 P. 2d at 1009]”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “As previously observed, the other parties adversely affected by the lower court's order did not pray an appeal. Had they done so, it is clear, from our opinion, that we would have held the order erroneous as to them. We are clear that we have the power to order a reversal as to them even though they did not appeal, and that we should do so under the circumstances here disclosed Hence complete reversal is the only proper way to avoid unnecessary complications and ambiguity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in disposing of a case before it, an appellate court has a broad power 'to make such disposition * * * as justice requires.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.