Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 F.2d 516 - Sublette v. Servel, Inc.

Sublette v. Servel, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

124 F.2d 516 · 1942

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
September 1997
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 1997

11 federal appellate ·

60194219501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pratt v. Stout · Oriole Phonograph Co. v. Kansas City Fabric Products Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is, of course, obvious that the question presented for review cannot be considered or determined by this Court upon the defective record furnished by the appellants. The findings of the trial court are presumptively correct. In the absence of a proper record, shown to contain all of the evidence essential to enable this Court to determine the correctness or incorrectness of the challenged findings, such findings cannot be questioned on review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.