Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

124 F.2d 787

Docket No. 12106.

Blood v. Pearson

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 13, 1942.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1942-01-13

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1960

2 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Relies on Love v. Chandler

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1942-01-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Vance E. Skahen, of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant.

¶2Carsten L. Jacobson, Asst. City Atty., of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellee Ole A. Pearson.

¶3Victor E. Anderson, U. S. Atty., of St. Paul, Minn. (Russell C. Rosenquest, Asst. U. S. Atty., of St. Paul, Minn., on the brief), for appellees H. L. Richards and B. J. McGlynn.

¶4Before GARDNER, SANBORN, and WOODROUGH, Circuit Judges.

¶5SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

¶6This is a companion case of Love v. Chandler et al., 124 F.2d 785, and was argued and submitted to this Court at the same time.

¶7The complaint of the appellant, which was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, was substantially similar to that considered in the Love case. Upon the authority of the decision of this Court in that case, which has been filed this day, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

/124/f2d/787 · .json · Public domain