Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 F.3d 1360 - United States v. Knox

United States v. Knox’s Empirical Analysis

124 F.3d 1360 · 1997

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
3
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Russell · Trammel v. United States · United States v. Owens · Shepard v. United States · United States v. Rivera

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A statement is not hearsay if the declar-ant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement and the statement is (1) inconsistent with the declarant's testimony, and was given under oath subject to the penalty of perjury at a trial, hearing, or other proceeding....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “ ‘affirm the rulings of the lower court on any ground that finds support in the record, even where the lower court reached its conclusions from a different or even erroneous course of reasoning.’ ”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`[W]e should hardly be warranted in reversing for the admission of evidence simply because the judge did not place his ruling on the ground that would most readily have supported it'.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.