Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

124 F.3d 207

Docket No. 97-1874.

Gilbert v. Reed

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Sept. 5, 1997. Filed: Sept. 19, 1997.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1997-09-19

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Conagra, Inc. v. Bartlett and Company

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1997-09-19

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2014

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

40199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.

¶1

Before McMILLIAN, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

¶2

Repoleon Gilbert, an Arkansas inmate, appeals from the district court's1 order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After review of the record and the parties' briefs on appeal, we conclude that the judgment of the district court was correct, and that an extended opinion would have no precedential value.

¶3

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable James Maxwell Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas

/124/f3d/207 · .json · Public domain