Gutierrez v. Maass

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Augued and Submitted September 8, 1997. Decided September 22, 1997.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1997-09-22

Relies on Hawara Q-20 Q-20 v. Mtc Distributing

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-09-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2014

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding; No. CV-95-06068-JMS.

Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

¶1

ORDER*

¶2

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart's Findings and Recommendation filed on March 14, 1996, and the district court's order filed on April 18, 1996.

¶3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3