Triestman v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
124 F.3d 361 · 1997
Citation profile
157 federal appellate · 17 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 340 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2024 · most notably Reyes-Requena v. United States (2001), Miller v. Marr (1998)
157 federal appellate · 17 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Teague v. Lane · Murray v. Carrier · United States v. Frady · McCarthy v. United States · Lindh v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 340 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a second or successive habeas must be certified . . . by a panel of the appropriate court of appeals.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in which the failure to allow for collateral review would raise serious constitutional questions.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in the appropriate court of appeals for an order authorizing the district court to consider the application.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.