Marceaux v. Conoco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
124 F.3d 730 · 1997
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2015
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 46 U.S.C. § 30104 (Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (Jones Act))
Relies on United States v. Olano · The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman · Highlands Insurance Company v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh · Marcel v. Placid Oil Co. · United States v. Graves
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party whose motion in limine is overruled must renew his objection when the evidence is about to be introduced at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.