Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

124 F. App'x 1002

Qualls v. Luttrell

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 30, 2005

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-03-30

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2006

1 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Jarvis v. Marcum

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-03-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

¶1 In this prisoner civil rights case for “deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s safety” brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the District Court dismissed the case because the prisoner, who is complaining of spiders in his cell, failed to file a proper grievance at any step in the grievance process. On appeal, the prisoner has dismissed all parties to this case other than Sheriff Luttrell and Director Ponte, who were sued in their official capacities only, and who the prisoner claims were deliberately indifferent to his welfare because they knew the Shelby County Jail had a serious spider problem.

¶2 The two remaining defendants, Luttrell and Ponte, are named only in their official capacities and not in their individual capacities. The suit seeks monetary damages and declaratory relief. As to the prisoner’s claim for monetary damages, sovereign immunity bars a § 1983 suit for monetary damages against a prison official in his official capacity. Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 71, 109 S.Ct. 2304, 105 L.Ed.2d 45 (1989); Jarvis v. Marcum, 77 Fed.Appx. 308 (6th Cir.2003). That portion of the prisoner’s suit that seeks declaratory relief is now moot because the prisoner has been moved to another facility.

¶3 Therefore, the District Court did not err in dismissing the complaint. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

¶4*1004 L

/124/fappx/1002 · .json · Public domain