In Re: Nalls’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1927
Relies on Richardson v. Henry · Crowe v. Smith · Resolution Trust Corp. v. Bright · Sealed 1 v. Sealed 1, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · In the Matter Of: Roy Dragoo v. John C Akard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“IT IS ORDERED that Mr. Clarence T. Nalls ... show cause ... why sanctions should not be imposed against him personally, under Fed. Rule Civ. P. 11, 28 U.S.C. § 1927 , and the inherent powers of the court....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.