Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 Fla. 494 - Lee v. Thompson

Lee v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2018

11 state decisions

40193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on International Text Book Co. v. . Connelly · In Re the Accounting of Lowe · Swiney v. Womack · Summerall v. Thoms · Edgerly v. Shaw

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Since the contracts of an infant are voidable or de facto, that is to say, subject to the possibility of disaffirmance, it follows that when the infant attains his majority and ratifies a contract made in infancy its infirmity is removed and it will be treated as valid from inception and the optional right to disaffirm abandoned. Ratification does not now require a new consideration to make it binding [citation omitted].””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.