Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 Fla. 718 - Cassady v. Sholtz

Cassady v. Sholtz’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 1999
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 1999

1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

401936194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Studebaker v. Johnson · Harris v. Edwards · Green v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An official bond binds the sheriff no further than he would be liable without it. The sole object of the bond is to secure the faithful performance of official duty. And no official act can be considered a breach of the condition of the bond to faithfully execute the duties of the office, unless it would, without bond, amount to a breach of official duty. See Studebaker v. Johnson, 41 Kan. 326 , 21 P. 271 , 13 A.S.R. 287; Forsyth v. Ellis, 4 J.J. Marsh (Ky) 298, 20 Am. Dec. 218 . "`Generally speaking, the purpose of an official bond is to provide indemnity against malfeasance and misbehavior in public office, the misuse of powers belonging to the office, and the assumption, under guise of official action, of powers not belonging to it. All acts so performed, though unlawful or wrongful, are official acts within the meaning of an undertaking that an officer shall faithfully and impartially discharge the duties of his office; and as such may be reasonably considered to have been within the contemplation of the sureties at the time they entered into the undertaking, as constituting a breach of its conditions.' 24 R.C.L. 956, Sec. 50.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.