124 F. Supp. 2d 307 - United States v. Bifield’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on United States v. Joshua · United States v. Smith · United States v. Voss · United States v. Bass · United States v. Bockius
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“emphasize that the sentencing court must apply the offense guideline referenced in the Statutory Index.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.