Jaylo v. Jaylo’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[does] not read the 2004 Guidelines to allow for the greater expenses of a disabled child younger than twenty-three but to forbid support to the same child because he or she could not, because of their disability, complete their education within the standard four years. We therefore hold that the family court could find that an adult child’s physical disability constitutes exceptional circumstances resulting in a child support award to that disabled adult child beyond the age of twenty-three. [[Image here]] However, on this record, it is unclear that the family court considered Daughter’s disability an exceptional circumstance that excused application of the twenty-three year-old age limit.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Jaylo v. Jaylo

2. “§ 580-47 Support orders; division of property, (a) Upon granting a divorce, or thereafter if, in addition to the powers granted in subsections (c) and (d), jurisdiction of those matters is reserved under the decree by agreement of both parties or by order of court after finding that good cause exists, the court may make any further orders as shall appear just and equitable (1) compelling the parties or either of them to provide for the support, maintenance, and education of the children of the parties [.]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Jaylo v. Jaylo