Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 Idaho 512 - State v. Dopp

State v. Dopp’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2004
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Ristaino v. Ross · United States v. Barker · State v. Colyer · State v. Carrasco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. whether appellant entered his guilty pleas knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently; and 2. whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellant's motion to withdraw a guilty pleas.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[o]nce the defendant has met this burden, the state may avoid the granting of the motion by demonstrating that prejudice would result from withdrawal of the plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.