Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 Idaho 543 - McHugh v. McHugh

McHugh v. McHugh’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
13
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2019

14 state decisions — followed in 13 states

70199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1408 · 38 U.S.C. § 3105

Relies on Mansell v. Mansell · Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc. · Abbott v. Nampa School District No. 131 · Griggs v. Griggs · Pass v. Kenny

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Richard additionally asserts that the [court's order] is erroneous on the basis that it essentially divides his disability pay, an item of his separate property which is not divisible. See Mansell v. Mansell, 490 U.S. 581 , 109 S.Ct. 2023 , 104 L.Ed.2d 675 (1989). [Citation omitted.] This argument is misplaced. The parties negotiated for and mutually agreed to a division of the military retired pay which granted Elisabet a specific monthly sum... . The two supplemental orders issued by the court did not alter this agreed- to division of the asset, but served simply to enforce it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This amount was not to be increased or decreased `for any reason' except by the application of cost-of-living increases, of which [the wife] was entitled to a pro rata share.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.