Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 Idaho 839 - Ausman v. State

Ausman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Hummer v. Evans (1996), Downey Chiropractic Clinic v. Nampa Restaurant Corp. (1995)

31 state decisions

1901993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McNelis v. McNelis · Mickelsen v. City of Rexburg · Walker v. Shoshone County · State v. Roderick · Guillard v. Department of Employment

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “After being presented with a sworn statement of an officer under this rule, if the person whose license was seized does not request a hearing within 7 days from the date of seizure of his license, as allowed by Section 18-8002, Idaho Code, the judge shall thereupon enter an order suspending the driver’s license of the defendant for 180 days pursuant to Section 18-8002, Idaho Code, without further notice to the party. The order suspending driving privileges and driver’s license shall be effective upon execution and shall apply to all driving privileges of the person, including those granted by any temporary license or permit issued by a police officer. The duty of the judge to enter such an order is a ministerial duty in which the judge has no discretion as to whether the order is to be entered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.