124 Ill. App. 2d 268 - People v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““8 8 8 except that, if the order suppressing evidence is nonfinal according to Section 109 — 3 of this Act, the property 8 8 8 shall not because of such order be inadmissible in evidence in any proceeding other than such preliminary hearing or examination.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. People v. Holland · 133 Ill. App. 2d 786 - People v. O'NEIL

2. ““(e) during preliminary hearing or examination the defendant may move for an order of suppression of evidence pursuant to Section 114 — 11 or 114 — 12 of this Act or for other reasons, and may move for dismissal of the charge pursuant to Section 114 — 1 of this Act or for other reasons. If any such order of suppression of evidence or dismissal of the charge is aHowed and issued in the course of any preliminary hearing or examination, such order of suppression or of dismissal shaH be non-final, the State may not appeal therefrom, and such order of suppression or of dismissal shaH not in any manner bar, affect or be determinative in any subsequent proceedings.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. People v. Holland

3. ““The plain unambiguous language of Section 114—12 (b) is that if a pretrial motion to suppress evidence is granted, the evidence suppressed under such order ‘shall not be admissible in evidence against the movant at any trial’.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 133 Ill. App. 2d 786 - People v. O'NEIL