124 Ill. App. 3d 770 - People v. Palmisano’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2014
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Jorn · United States v. Scott · United States v. Josef Perez · 74 Ill. 2d 527 - People Ex Rel. Mosley v. Carey · 75 Ill. App. 3d 580 - People v. Pendleton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Because of the complexities of the trial itself, some prosecutorial or judicial error may inevitably occur in a significant number of cases. To preclude reprosecution whenever such error results in a mistrial would exact too high a price for the defendant’s interest in finality and accord too little weight to society’s final interest in the enforcement of criminal laws.” People v. Palmisano, 124 Ill. App. 3d 770, 773 (1984).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“did not constitute judicial overreaching”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Butler v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.