124 Ind. App. 280 - Mousley v. CURRY’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 1985
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 97 Ind. App. 592 - Humphrey v. Pleasure Park Company · 106 Ind. App. 387 - Cunningham v. Colen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The finding of the Board that the appellee ‘should be furnished additional’ specified services ‘to limit and reduce the extent of the disability or impairment’ is not a finding of the ultimate fact that such services would or would tend to limit or reduce the amount and extent of the disability or impairment. “It follows from what we have said that the Board has failed to find facts essential to its award and that such award is contrary to law and cannot be sustained. We cannot examine the evidence to see if it supported the facts which the Board failed to find. Cunningham, et al. v. Colen (1939), 106 Ind. App. 387 , 20 N.E.2d 200 . “The award is reversed and remanded.” 124 Ind. App. at 284 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"If after an employee's injury has been adjudicated by agreement or award on the basis of permanent partial impairment ... the industrial board may ... require that treatment by such physician and other medical services and supplies be furnished by and on behalf of the employer as the industrial board may deem mecessary to limit or reduce the amount and extent of such impairment." (Emphasis supplied)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“necessary to limit or reduce the amount and extent of such impairment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.