State v. Boone’s Empirical Analysis
1927
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 1980
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Adams · State v. Roselli · State v. Mowry · State v. Patterson · State v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . The evidence that the companions of the appellant took guns with them tended to prove that they intended to kill if it became necessary in order to accomplish their design or to effect their escape. . . .” (p. 211.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The appellant also contends that ‘The court should have given an instruction with reference to circumstantial evidence.’ None was requested by the appellant, and she cannot now complain that none was given.” (State v. Boone, 124 Kan. 208, 212 , 257 Pac. 739 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hancock
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.