Rasmussen v. Rasmussen’s Empirical Analysis
1927
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1951
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miller v. Miller · State v. Robinson · Miller v. Miller · Danielson v. Danielson · Corbett v. Corbett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under hackneyed rules of appellate review it is only where the trial court manifestly abuses its discretion that its award of alimony in divorce proceedings can be disturbed.” (p. 462.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Besse v. Besse
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.