Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 Md. App. 288 - Schaefer v. Cusack

124 Md. App. 288 - Schaefer v. Cusack’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
May 2007
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Innkeepers of New Castle, Inc. v. Maley · In Re Marriage of Burgess · Hodge v. South Carolina · Deering v. Deering · Ross v. Hoffman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The attorney for [the cross-appellant] did not insist [that the witness be sworn]. She testified. There was no objection to her testimony. The attorney for [the cross-appellant] did not move to strike the testimony. [The cross-appellant]’s attorney had the opportunity to cross-examine Ms. Gentry. Rule 2-517 states in pertinent part: An objection to the admission of evidence shall be made at the time the evidence is offered or as soon thereafter as a grounds for objection become apparent. Otherwise, the objection is waived.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Objection to a witness’ testifying who has not made an oath or affirmation will be considered waived unless made before the testimony or, if the witness is not on the stand as soon as it should be apparent that the witness is testifying.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.