People v. Casey’s Empirical Analysis
1900
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
April 1933
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Connecticut Mut Life Ins Co v. Lathrop · Armstrong v. State · People v. Sanford · Beaubien v. Cicotte · Prentis v. Bates
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The object of this is not merely to advise a respondent what witnesses will be produced on the main charge. It is to guard him against the production of persons who are unknown, and whose character he should have an opportunity to canvass. It is as important to impeach a rebutting witness as any other.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Koukol
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.