Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 Misc. 2d 636 - Roffman v. Roffman

124 Misc. 2d 636 - Roffman v. Roffman’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 1987
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The concept of equitable distribution is a corollary of the principle that marriage is a joint enterprise whose 'vitality, success and endurance is dependent upon the conjunction of multiple components, only one of which is financial. The nonremun-erated efforts of raising children, making a home, performing a myriad of personal services and providing physical and emotional support are, among other noneco-nomic ingredients of the marital relationship, at least as essential to its nature and maintenance as are the economic factors, and their worth is consequently entitled to substantial recognition. Thus, the extent to which each of the parties contributes to the marriage is not measurable only by the amount of money contributed to it during the period of its endurance but, rather, by the whole complex of financial and nonfinancial components contributed. The function of equitable distribution is to recognize that when a marriage ends, each of the spouses, based on the totality of the contributions made to it, has a stake in and right to a share of the marital assets accumulated while it endured, not because that share is needed, but because those assets represent the capital product of what was essentially a partnership entity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.