Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

124 Mo. 466

State v. Russell

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 5, 1894

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1894-11-05

—Hon. Jas. J. Gideon, Judge. (1) The well established rule in this state is that the bill of exceptions must be filed during the term at which the defendant’s appeal was. allowed, unless otherwise ordered by the court, and that in no event can the defendant file his bill of exceptions in vacation except by permission of the court entered of record. State v. Berry, 103 Mo. 367; Webster Co. v. Cunningham, 101 Mo. 642; R. S. 1889, see. 2168.

Relies on State v. Berry · State v. Ryan

Aeeirmed · Decided 1894-11-05

Sheewood, J.

¶1This cause originated in Christian county. Indicted there for an assault with intent to kill one William McElhaney, defendant changed his venue to Greene county, where, upon trial, his conviction and sentence followed, and he appeals to this court.

¶2The indictment is valid on its face, and the' record proper regular, which must result in an affirmance of the judgment, because the bill of exceptions was filed in vacation and no order of record entered in term time permitting the filing of the bill in vacation was made. State v. Berry, 103 Mo. 367; R. S. 1889, sec. 2168; State v. Ryan, 120 Mo. 88.

All concur.
/124/mo/466 · .json · Public domain